What effect do power-sharing institutions agreed to as part of civil war settlements have on the development of the rule of law in post–civil war states? We contend that power-sharing measures facilitate the emergence of the rule of law in two ways. First, they establish a form of institutional constraint that promotes judicial autonomy and independence. Second, they foster a sense of security among judges and other political actors that bolsters commitment to the law. We demonstrate the plausibility of a positive relationship between power sharing and the rule of law through an analysis of post–civil war states between the years 1948 and 2006. Our findings suggest that civil war settlements can help to establish the rule of law when they include mechanisms aimed at allaying the insecurities of political actors in the postconflict environment.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Version of Record
Hartzell, Caroline A., and Matthew Hoddie. (2019). Power Sharing and the Rule of Law in the Aftermath of Civil War. International Studies Quarterly 63(3), 641-653.
Required Publisher's Statement
This article is also available on the publisher's website: https://academic.oup.com/isq/article/63/3/641/5490304