Joke Capital, Punching Up/Punching Down, and Accounting for the Ethical Relation between Joker and Target
Roles
Thomas Wilk '05, Gettysburg College
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-11-2024
Department 1
Philosophy
Department 2
Judaic Studies
Abstract
The currently dominant view concerning humor ethics is punching up/punching down. According to this view, members of one community with less social capital are allowed to make jokes at the expense of another with more social capital as a means of achieving social justice, while those in a community with more social capital are forbidden from making jokes about those with less. The latter is considered an act of bullying, which further entrenches pre-existing social injustice. While there is value in the moral intuitions that underlay this view, it falls prey to several problems. A new approach, the joke capital approach, is introduced which has the virtue of accounting for the cases in which punching up/punching down is effective but also is capable of handling the problematic cases.
Copyright Note
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
DOI
10.1515/phhumyb-2024-0004
Version
Version of Record
Recommended Citation
Gimbel, Steven and Thomas Wilk. "Joke Capital vs. Punching Up/Punching Down: Accounting for the Ethical Relation between Joker and Target" The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 5, no. 1 (2024): 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1515/phhumyb-2024-0004
Required Publisher's Statement
This article is available for purchase on the publisher's website: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/phhumyb-2024-0004/html.