Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Department 1
Political Science
Abstract
Religious movements have long been challenging the modernist and secularist ideas around the world. Within the last decade or so, pro-religious parties made significant electoral advances in various countries, including India, Sudan, Algeria, and the Palestinian territories. In this article, we focus on the rise of the pro-religious Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi- AKP) to power in the 2002 elections in Turkey. Using the Turkish experience with political Islam, we evaluate the explanatory value of Mark Juergensmeyer's rise of religious nationalism theory, with a special emphasis on the "failed secularism" argument. Our analysis indicates that the theoretical approach formulated by Juergensmeyer has a great deal of explanatory power; however, it does not provide a complete explanation for the success of the AKP. The rise of religion in Turkish politics is the result of a complex process over long years of encounter and confrontation between two frameworks of order, starting with the sudden imposition of secularism from above, when the republic was established. Hence, to understand the rise of religion in contemporary Turkish politics, an in-depth understanding of history, politics, and the sources of tension between secularists and Islamists is essential. The findings of this article have important implications for other countries, especially those that are experiencing a resurgence of religion in politics, and are struggling to integrate religious parties into a democratic system.
Copyright Note
This is the publisher's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution.
DOI
10.1017/S1755048312000296
Recommended Citation
Taydas, Zepnep, Akbaba, Yasemin, and Minion K.C. Morrison. "Did Secularism Fail? The Rise of Religion in Turkish Politics." Politics and Religion (2012) 5(3):528-554.
Required Publisher's Statement
Original version available from the publisher at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8791734&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S1755048312000296
Included in
New Religious Movements Commons, Political Theory Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons