Representation in Science and Trust in Scientists in the USA

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-8-2025

Department 1

Political Science

Abstract

Scientists provide important information to the public. Whether that information influences decision-making depends on trust. In the USA, gaps in trust in scientists have been stable for 50 years: women, Black people, rural residents, religious people, less educated people and people with lower economic status express less trust than their counterparts (who are more represented among scientists). Here the authors probe the factors that influence trust. They find that members of the less trusting groups exhibit greater trust in scientists who share their characteristics (for example, women trust women scientists more than men scientists). They view such scientists as having more benevolence and, in most cases, more integrity. In contrast, those from high-trusting groups appear mostly indifferent about scientists’ characteristics. Their results highlight how increasing the presence of underrepresented groups among scientists can increase trust. This means expanding representation across several divides—not just gender and race/ethnicity but also rurality and economic status.

DOI

10.1038/s41562-025-02358-4

This item is not available in The Cupola.

Share

COinS