Class Year
2019
Document Type
Student Research Paper
Date of Creation
Spring 2018
Department 1
Management
Abstract
The lack of females occupying leadership positions in the modern workplace has prompted the research of this study. In order to better understand the perceptions that exist regarding successful leadership, this study was conducted with the intention of understanding individual leadership style through the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, which measures transactional and transformational leadership styles (Bass and Avolio, 1993). 64 male and female participants, made up of 36 students and 28 individuals in the workforce ages 18-61 with an average age of 31 answered 21 questions to assess their leadership style and 1 to measure who they perceived as a successful leader, with responses coded by gender of responder and response. This study aimed to assess whether males identified more with transactional leadership and females with transformational leadership style, which would confirm current research conducted in the field. The Chi Squared statistical analysis test results showed that 72.4% of males displayed transformational leadership styles, along with 82.9% of females displaying this same style, which showed a lack of significance between gender and difference in leadership style. However, in response to the question asking to identify a successful leader, results showed that most individuals of both gender wrote down a male leader.
Copyright Note
This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution.
Recommended Citation
Igram, Quinn I.; Garstka, Andrew N.; and Harris, Lindsay D., "Perceptions of Transactional and Transformational Leaders According to Gender" (2018). Student Publications. 601.
https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/601
Included in
Applied Statistics Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons
Comments
Written for OMS 301: Research Methods